State v. Garrett
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
The original judgments and sentences of these three defendants were set aside and their cases were remanded to the trial court for consideration of the evidence (and of any additional evidence) on prior convictions under the Second Offender Act, § 556.-280, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., and for appropiate findings thereon by the trial court. See State v. Garrett, Mo., 416 S.W.2d 116, 119, 120. The defendants now challenge the sufficiency of the procedure under the Second Offender Act, and the sufficiency of the evidence of the prior convictions, as detailed below. Defendants…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. ShulsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. GoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. ArbeiterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Keeny v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Billy Joe Garrett v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.