Legal Opinion

Khadijah X. Chapman v. United States of America

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided April 24, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00075Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO KHADIJAH X. CHAPMAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00075-AKB Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION v. AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Khadijah X. Champman’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(Dkt. 1) and Motion to Compel a Ruling (Dkt. 8). Having reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that the facts and legal argument are adequately presented, and that oral argument would not significantly aid its decision-making process, and it decides the motion on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API