Legal Opinion

United States v. Specialist CHRISTOPHER R. KEARNS

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 17, 2013No. ARMY 20110348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KRAUSS, Judge:

A panel of officers sitting as a general court-martial properly tried appellant in ab-sentia, and convicted him, contrary to his pleas of not guilty properly entered, of false official statement, aggravated sexual assault of a child, transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity (as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a)), and disorderly conduct, in violation of Articles 107, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 920, 934 (2006 & Supp. II 2008) [hereinafter UCMJ]. 1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API