United States v. Specialist CHRISTOPHER R. KEARNS
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KRAUSS, Judge:
A panel of officers sitting as a general court-martial properly tried appellant in ab-sentia, and convicted him, contrary to his pleas of not guilty properly entered, of false official statement, aggravated sexual assault of a child, transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity (as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a)), and disorderly conduct, in violation of Articles 107, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 920, 934 (2006 & Supp. II 2008) [hereinafter UCMJ]. 1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014