Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. Haugen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1995No. Civ. 940277PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Ruvold and Phyllis Jacobsen appealed from the trial court’s judgment1 granting Gene Haugen’s Rule 50, N.D.R.Civ.P.,2 motion for judgment as a matter of law. We conclude that this malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations, and we affirm the judgment of dismissal.

First National Bank & Trust Company of Williston sued Jacobsens in 1987 to recover on various notes and personal guaranties. Jacobsens were represented by Haugen. The trial court granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment on January 18, 1988. Judgment was entered on January 21, 1988. Upon his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Allied Productions, Inc. v. DuesterdickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stanley v. TrinchardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API