Legal Opinion
Frances Denney v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 5, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6410PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing an opposition to trademark application, serial No. 650,-344, for registration of “Invisible Veil” for pressed face powder, use since June 1, 1953 being asserted. Opposer-appel-lant relied on use since March of 1951 of its unregistered mark “Invisible Beauty Strap,” for a vanishing liquid cream.
The record indicates no question as to priority of use, the opposer appearing to be the prior user herein.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bellbrook Dairies, Inc. (Edlo, Inc., Assignee, Substituted) v. Hawthorn-Mellody Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Hat Corporation of America v. John B. Stetson CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re: I.am.symbolic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., by Change of Name From Carter Products Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Sealy, Incorporated v. Simmons CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- S C M Corporation v. Royal McBee CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- ALP of South Beach Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.