Legal Opinion

Sealy, Incorporated v. Simmons Company

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6420PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, reversing the Examiner of Interferences and dismissing an opposition to the application 1 for registration by the Simmons Company, appellee here, of the mark “Baby Posture,” for mattresses. The appellant, Sealy, Incorporated, opposed the application on the ground of likelihood of confusion of prospective purchasers between “Baby Posture” and appellant’s prior registered “Posture-pedic” 2 and “Posture Pillow” 3 and the unregistered mark “Baby Posturepedie,” each mark being…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. B. R. Baker Co. v. Lebow Bro's.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Ernest Wilson v. Arthur J. DelaunayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Hat Corporation of America v. John B. Stetson CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carl M. Martahus, D/B/A Video Cassette Duplication Services v. Video Duplication Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. S C M Corporation v. Royal McBee CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Big Pig, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2006
  4. Mercoid Corporation v. Airborne Instruments Laboratory, Inc. (Cutler-Hammer, Inc., Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. S C M Corporation v. Royal McBee CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API