Legal Opinion

Bockman v. Bockman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1942No. 4-6854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

December 6, 1941, appellee, James Bock-man, filed suit for divorce in the Phillips chancery court. Separation without cohabitation for three years, in accordance with the seventh subdivision of § 2 of Act 20 of 1939, was the only ground for divorce alleged by appellee. Appellant answered, specifically denying separation within the meaning of the statute, and asked that appellee’s complaint be dismissed for-want of equity, and for attorney’s fees. From a decree granting appellee a divorce, comes this appeal.

It is undisputed that the parties here were married December 24, 1925, and lived…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bockman v. BockmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Serio v. SerioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watnick v. BockmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Cabrer Llull v. Pietri TrocheSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  3. Larsen v. LarsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Cabrer Llull v. Pietri TrocheSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  5. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API