Legal Opinion

Giordano v. Markovitz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1995No. Docket 159748PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right a verdict, entered by the trial court following a bench trial, that found no cause of action for ten of his eleven counts and awarded him $139,914.83 in restitution plus prejudgment interest.

Plaintiff and defendant Markovitz were equal partners in Malan Entertainment, a corporation operating "BT’s,” a topless bar. Plaintiff, Markovitz, and James Aboud formed ABT Corporation for the purpose of purchasing and operating "CanCan’s,” another topless bar. Each party had a one-third ownership interest in ABT. Before the Liquor Control Commission (lcc) approved ABT’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. PARKHURST HOMES, INC v. McLAUGHLINMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Ordon v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Madison National Bank v. LipinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Davidson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thermatool Corp. v. BorzymMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. City of Port Huron v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Cynthia Neal Vittiglio v. Thomas Anthony VittiglioMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cynthia Neal Vittiglio v. Thomas Anthony VittiglioMichigan Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API