Wilmington v. McDonald.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by the City of Wilmington against Bridget McDonald and others, heard by Judge B. B. Peebles> at January Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of New Hanover County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
This action is prosecuted by the plaintiff, the City of Wilmington, for the purpose of collecting certain taxes assessed against the property of the defendants specifically described in the complaint. The plaintiff alleges that the land was lawfully assessed for taxation by said city at the valuation and the rate set forth for years enumerated, amounting to $534.38. Tbe complaint also alleges that certain taxes were levied upon the “personal property and poll of tbe defendants, • Hugh McDonald and Bridget McDonald, amounting to $18.35.” Hugh McDonald is not a party to this action. Tbe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Wilmington v. CronlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Boddie v. . WoodardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- John S. Reese & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Jones v. . WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Thompson v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- United American Free-Will Baptist Church v. United American Free-Will Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.