Legal Opinion

Boddie v. . Woodard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil Action tried at Fall Term, 1879, of Nash'Superior Court, before Eure, J. . The facts appear in the opinion. . Judgment for plaintiff, appeal by defendant, Moore. . __ .

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The summons in this action instituted to recover the amount due on a bond executed by the intestate, A. E. Ricks, and the defendant, Moses Moore, was duly served and returned to spring term, 1879, of Nash superior court. At that term the complaint was filed by the plaintiff’s attorney and the following entry appears in the cause upon the docket: “ Complaint filed ; time to demur or answer.” Neither defendant appeared in person or by attor-ney, nor was there any understanding or agreement with either for an extension of time for making his defence. At fall term following, the defendant, Moore,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilmington v. McDonald.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Long v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. John S. Reese & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Warden v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API