Sekora v. Industrial Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
Petitioner, Peter W. Sekora, sought worker’s compensation benefits after injuring his leg while working for respondent, Du Page Honda. An arbitrator awarded benefits. The Industrial Commission reversed, finding petitioner failed to prove he sustained accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. The trial court confirmed the Commission’s decision. On appeal, petitioner contends the Commission’s decision is wrong as a matter of law and is against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Petitioner testified that on August 8, 1983, he worked part time for respondent as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scheffler Greenhouses, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Union Starch v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Eagle Discount Supermarket v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Yost v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clodgo v. Rentavision, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Pechan v. Dynapro, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Lenny Szarek, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Clodgo v. Rentavision, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Lakeside Architectural Metals v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994