Sherrod v. Duffy
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Missaukee; Chittenden, J. Assumpsit by Sumler J. Sherrod and Glover A. Nash against Martin Duffy upon promissory notes. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case was commenced for the recovery of the amount of three notes executed by the defendant on the 26th day of October, 1905, to the Burnap Building &c Supply Company, and by them indorsed to the plaintiffs without recourse. The defendant pleaded the general issue and gave notice that at the time of the execution of said notes an agreement in writing in connection therewith was made, which will appear later; that this agreement was made before the notes were given, was put in writing at the time the notes were given, and was known to plaintiffs at the time the notes were transferred to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Schliess v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Chafin v. Main Island Creek Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Muir v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Sterling v. Victor Cushwa & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Wellman Pipe Line Co. v. Allegan County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1939