Legal Opinion

Currie v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1943No. 9376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

The sole question the appeal presents is whether the title to one-half interest in delay rentals, thereafter accruing and paid under two mineral leases covering 20 sections in Sterling County, passed to appellants (Currie and Wahlenmaier, plaintiffs below) under a grant in a drilling contract between appellants and appellee (R. H. Harris, defendant below). The controlling facts, which are without dispute, are:

R. H. and F. L. Harris owned a large number of sections of land in Sterling and other counties. March 7, 1928, R. H. Harris and wife conveyed his half interest…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Schlittler v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hager v. StakesTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Phillips Petroleum Company and Geophysical Services, Inc. v. Elliott F. CowdenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Alfrey v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Harris v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API