Legal Opinion
Cox v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 6, 2005No. 1:03 CV 1036PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Corrine Cox (“Cox”) brings suit against her former employers, defendants Quick & Reilly, Inc. (“Q & R”), a broker age and investment firm, and FleetBoston Financial Corporation (“Fleet”), its parent company. She asserts four causes of action against the. defendants: (1) Violation of the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206(d); (2) Discrimination on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; (8) Discrimination on the basis of sex, in violation of the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Black v. Buffalo Meat Service, Inc. d/b/a Boulevard Black Angus a/k/a Black Angus Meats a/k/a Black Angus Meats & SeafoodDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- CARTEE-HARING v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Corcoran v. Boston ScientificDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Marinello v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Miller v. University of Maryland Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.