Legal Opinion

Bay View, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 19, 2000No. 99-456LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

WEINSTEIN, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Plaintiff alleges 1 that Congress’ 1995 amendment of section 1606(i) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1629(f) (1994 & Supp. III 1997)2 constitutes a taking of plaintiff’s property (Count I); a breach of trust (Count II); and a breach of contract (Count III).3 The court dismisses Count II for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see RCFC 12(b)(1), and Counts I and III for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bay View, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Meyers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Bay View, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API