Clark v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The question presented by Clark is whether a police search of his rented vehicle was invalid. The question presented by the State on cross-appeal is whether Clark’s sentence was too lenient. We answer no to both questions and affirm. The necessary facts are set forth in the discussion of each question.
THE SEARCH
Clark was personally searched by the Ketchikan police pursuant to a valid search warrant. 1 The search took place at 4:45 A.M. on a public street. Just prior to the search Clark had been walking toward his rented car with a companion, Ms. Ramirez; when he was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PeacherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DanielAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- State v. MyersAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.