Legal Opinion
RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 10, 2005No. CIV 03-2609DSDSRNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Based upon a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court grants plaintiffs motion in part, denies plaintiffs motion in part and denies defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
This is an action on a fidelity bond. Plaintiff RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc., (“RBC Dain”) the assured, is a securities broker holding customer assets of more than $108 billion. Defendants Federal Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (collectively “Federal”) is RBC Dain’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- First National Bank of Crandon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avon State Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Abady v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Mortgage Bankers Bond No. MBB-06-0009Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Federal Insurance Company v. Axos Clearing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020