Legal Opinion

Buffalo Forge Co. v. Cullen & Stock Manufacturing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — No». J. R. Kinealy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

The Cullen & Stock Manufacturing Company under its previous name of the Cullen & Stock Heating and Ventilating Company, made a contract with the board of education of the city of St. Louis, July 9, 1901, to construct and install in the Emerson school building a heating and ventilating apparatus for the sum of $11,387. The Cullen Company gave the board of education a bond with the City Trust, Safe Deposit and Surety Company of Philadelphia as surety. Said bond provided that if the principal in it, the Cullen Company, should perform its contract in full, pay all obligations incurred by it for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Maggi v. LoomisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. WindMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Fry v. P. Bannon Sewer Pipe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. EAU Claire-St. Louis Lumber Co. v. BanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. State Board of Agriculture v. DimickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Pickel Stone Co. v. McClintinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API