State v. Cook, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I believe that the state failed to meet the final prong of the plain view doctrine by failing to demonstrate that the razor blade in appellant's ashtray was "immediately recognizable as an illegal object or contraband;" i.e. drug paraphernalia.
Under the plain view doctrine, a police officer may seize an item without a warrant, where: (1) the initial intrusion was lawful; (2) the discovery of the evidence was inadvertent; and, (3) the incriminating nature of the evidence was immediately apparent. State v. Williams (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 82,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.