Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Sepeda

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1977No. Crim. 2644PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARGANO, Acting P. J.

Appellants Ray Sanchez Sepeda, Sr., and Lanora Sepeda are husband and wife; they were convicted by a jury of selling heroin in violation of section 11352 of the Health and Safety Code. Appellants’ applications for probation were denied and they were sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. They have appealed from the judgment.

On May 28, 1975, at approximately 5:30 p.m., Mike Rodriguez, a paid informant working for the Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement, met with Agent. Peter Mouriski and other agents of the bureau to prepare for a “buy” of heroin they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. People v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. SullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. MezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API