Legal Opinion

State v. Harnett County Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants entered a special appearance and moved that as to them the action be dismissed. The motion was denied, and they excepted and appealed.

The appeal must be dismissed. It is fragmentary and premature. An appeal from an interlocutory order will not ordinarily be entertained. Watts v. Staton, 191 N. C., 215; Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632; Mann v. Gibbs, 156 N. C., 44; Turner v. Holden, 109 N. C., 182; Guilford v. Georgia Co., ibid., 310.

Appeal dismissed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Turner v. . HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. State Ex Rel. Mann v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Watts v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Utilities Com. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944