State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The intervening appellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it is premature and fragmentary, being from an order which is not a final judgment. No appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss an order or a proceeding. Johnson v. Pilot Life Ins. Co., 215 N. C., 120, 1 S. E. (2d), 381; Stewart v. Craven, 205 N. C., 439, 171 S. E., 609; S. v. Harnett County Trust Co., 193 N. C., 834, 136 S. E., 732; Goldsboro v. Holmes, 183 N. C., 203, 111 S. E., 1; Capps v. R. R., 182 N. C., 758, 108 S. E., 300; Parr v. Lumber Co., 182 N. C., 725, 109 S. E., 383; Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632, 90 S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Farr v. Babcock Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- City of Goldsboro v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Durham Fertilizer Co. v. MarshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.