Legal Opinion
Varallo v. Ohio
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 21, 1970No. Civ. Nos. 1268-1270PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FISHER, Chief Judge.
Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Clerk will file each petition without prepayment of costs as an application for writ of habeas corpus.
Each' of these petitions presents a similar fact situation: an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution at Texarkana, Texas, seeks to al. tack detainer warrants which have been filed against him by authorities of another state. The United States Supreme Court has held, in Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374, 89 S.Ct. 575, 21 L.Ed.2d 607 (1969), that a State may not ignore the request of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bales v. TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Haynie v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- John T. Reed v. J. D. Henderson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.