Legal Opinion

People v. Chuey Ying Git

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1893No. 21013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The appellants were accused by information of the crime of robbery, and upon a trial Woo Ah Woy and Chung Ki Foon were convicted.

The appeal is prosecuted from the final judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The first objection to the judgment is that the court erred in rendering judgment against the defendants in the case, “because the information upon which said defendants were tried and convicted did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense.”

The information is in all respects in consonance with the usual form in cases of robbery, except that the only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People v. SwensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. TownsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People v. CovingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. HewittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API