Legal Opinion

Echeverria v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2003No. 38691PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether a harmless-error analysis applies to the State’s breach of a plea agreement and whether such a breach requires reassignment to a different district court judge for sentencing. We conclude that a harmless-error analysis does not apply and that reassignment is required, and we vacate the judgment of conviction and remand this case for a new sentencing hearing before a different district court judge.

FACTS

Ricardo Ventura Echeverria was charged with lewdness with a child under the age of fourteen. Echeverria and the State entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Van Buskirk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Citti v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kluttz v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Riley v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WaldnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. GONZALES (MELVIN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Echeverria v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Garcia (Ubaldo) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Garcia (Ubaldo) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API