Legal Opinion
W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Von Carstedt, Individually and Doing Business as C-Air Aviation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1966No. 19474_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
The Secretary of Labor brought this action against Von Carstedt, individually and doing business as C-Air Aviation, to enjoin future violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (Act). 1 After a trial the district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law upholding defendant’s claim to exemption from the requirements of the Act. A judgment consistent therewith was entered and the Secretary appeals.
This case involves the application of the Act to twenty workers who were employed by defendant during various parts of the period from February 18, 1961 to February 18,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Troy Lee Hunt, D/B/A Gatesville Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- McComb v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Mitchell v. Trade Winds Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Do v. Ocean Peace Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Nellis v. G.R. Herberger Revocable TrustDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
- Hodgson v. SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDADistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Bora Do v. Ocean Peace Inc, in Personam Ocean Peace F/t, Official No. 677399, Her Engine, MacHinery Appurtenances and Cargo, in Rem, Tinh Pham v. Ocean Peace Inc, in Personam United States Seafoods Lp, in Personam Seafreeze Alaska F/t, Official No. 517242, Her Engines, MacHinery Apurtenances, and Cargo, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002