Corbin v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was instituted to obtain a decree canceling a deed given to defendant Emma E. Howard by Frank II. Corbin, of whose estate the plaintiff is the residuary legatee. The ground of cancellation insisted on was that the grantor, to the grantee’s knowledge, was mentally incompetent to contract, and that the grantee fraudulently took advantage of the weak mind of the grantor. Frank II. Corbin, by deed executed the twenty-eighth day of July, 1916, conveyed to Emma E. Howard certain real property situated in the county of Tulare. Thereafter the said Howard conveyed said land to defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flynn v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Campodonico v. GrossiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ellsworth v. United States Metals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Stauffacher v. Great Falls Public Service Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Jones v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946