Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. Friedrichs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 29, 1906No. 16,047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. Actiou by Henry L. Lazarus against George-G. Friedrichs. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

LAND, J.

The petition alleges an indebtedness on a contract for professional services as an attorney at, law.

The answer admits that there was a contract by which defendant and one Harry D. Brown agreed to pay plaintiff $10,000 in stock of the Jockey Club, but specially avers that the consideration was not for professional services rendered, or to be rendered, but for services as a promoter in obtaining subscriptions and raising funds sufficient to place-the Jockey Club on a safe footing and to insure its success, which services were never-rendered.

Plaintiff testified to the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Carl v. Judge of the First City CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rizan v. RizanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. O'Niell v. GuytherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Hart v. Mohawk Motor Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Lazarus v. FriedrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. Martin v. PichonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API