Farley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. Three issues are presented on appeal
I
A
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce into evidence "mug shots" to bolster the in-court identification of the witness to the crime when the defense had not attacked the photographic lineup
On August 27, 1979, the home of Mr. and Mrs. Hugh Keel, Jr was burglarized by three men. Tammy Morgan, the Keels' next-door neighbor, was the only witness to the crime. She observed the defendant and two other men come from the house…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Racine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Britain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Grace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.