Legal Opinion

Peters v. Powell

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.

This is a motion under rule 109 of the Buies of Civil Practice to strike out the defense contained in paragraph fourth of the answer on the ground that the same is insufficient in law. Said paragraph fourth alleged that the complaint was outlawed by reason of the Statute of Limitations as set forth in subdivision 1 of section 50 of the Civil Practice Act in that plaintiff’s complaint was not served within two years of the date of the accrual of the cause of action.

*510Briefly, the facts appear to be that one Felicia L. Peters was fatally injured in an automobile accident which occurred on June…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'NEILL v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Federal International Banking Company v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Camp v. ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Registered Country Homebuilders, Inc. v. StebbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Di Pietro v. Hecker, New York County Courts1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API