Champion v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
This appeal from denial of coram nobis raises only a question of fact.
The fact at issue is whether or not Champion voluntarily pleaded guilty to a grand larceny indictment for which he got a sentence of one year and a day.
He testified but brought out nothing to show that he could have probably maintained a not guilty plea. Champion’s fear seems to have been that he could get up to ten years in prison. His former attorney *661was called by the State and testified that he did not coerce Champion into pleading guilty.
Under Code 1940, T. 13, § 66 (third sentence), we close this opinion.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Little v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Holsclaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Bender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.