Legal Opinion

Holsclaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of error coram nobis.

Petitioner alleges that he is entitled to a new trial because he waived his right to a trial by jury based on the false representation of appointed counsel that if the case were tried without a jury the judge would "throw out" the case for insufficient evidence.

At the hearing on the petition, petitioner was the only witness to testify. A copy of the jury waiver form signed by the defendant states, in part, "This waiver is made voluntarily and without threat, promise or hope of reward and is made on and with advice…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Seibert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Traylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Dunkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Boatwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Colvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API