Pickering v. Richardson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Rice, J., entered June 19, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in consolidated actions for the foreclosure of chattel mortgages.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
The plaintiff in this case instituted two actions against defendant Richardson as receiver of the Shore Lumber Company, and others, to foreclose two certain chattel mortgages covering property which had formerly been in the possession of the Shore Lumber Company, but had been sold by the receiver under an order of the court made in an action prosecuted by McIntosh & Swan against the Shore Lumber Company and H. Wilson. These actions were begun against the receiver after permission of the court had been first obtained. The first mortgage covered certain sawmill *118machinery which had been leased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bosworth v. Terminal R. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Hallam v. TillinghastWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Felton v. AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Brundage v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Merrill v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoebel v. RaymondIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Cavanaugh v. Art Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Delaware v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936