Legal Opinion

Delaware v. Gray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRchild, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied. A receiver is regarded as an executive officer of a court of chancery. The property held by him, under the proceedings, is held for the benefit of whomsoever may ultimately establish title to it. He is therefore required to protect the estate from claims not lawfully allowable. As suggested by respondent, in support of its motion to dismiss the appeal, a receiver, acting within the scope of his authority as given by the court, incurs no personal liability. But, in protecting the estate against liabilities the legality of which is seriously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McKinnon v. WolfendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Standard, C., Co. v. American Salpa Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Pickering v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API