Elliott v. City of Auburn
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentSpencer, J.
The facts in this case are set out in detail in our opinion. I shall set out only those pertinent to the consideration of the case.
This is an action in equity against the county treasurer and others to declare special paving assessments void and to enjoin their collection. A demurrer was sustained to the plaintiffs’ second amended petition. Plaintiffs' appeal.
Plaintiffs’ second amended petition with reference to the petition presented for the creation of the paving district alleges in substance that on April 7, 1958, there were 19 or more resident owners of real estate directly abutting upon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ogden City v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Kosmicki v. KowalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Wiborg v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1964