Legal Opinion

Sheridanville, Inc. v. Borough of Wrightstown

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 14, 1954No. Civ. Nos. 387, 621PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, Sheridanville, Inc., and Fort Dix Apartments Corporation, are New Jersey corporations. Each leased land from the United States for the purpose *745of constructing an apartment house project on its reservation at Fort Dix, Burlington County, New Jersey. After the structures were completed the Borough of Wrightstown, a municipal corporation, through its tax collector, I. Haines Crowshaw, and the Township of Springfield, through its tax collector, R. J. Beazley, in the case of plaintiff, Sheridanville, Inc., sought to collect municipal taxes from it and in the case of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Kiker v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Meade Heights, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Morton Salt Co. v. City of South HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henry Barracks Housing Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  2. Fort Dix Apartments Corp. v. Borough of WrightstownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Edgeboro Disposal, Inc. v. Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
  4. Fort Dix Apartments Corp., a Corporation v. Borough of Wrightstown, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown, New Hanover Township Board of Education, Intervenor, County of Burlington, Intervenor. Sheridanville, Inc., a Corporation v. Borough of Wrightstown, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown, Township of Springfield, a Municipal Corporation, and R. J. Beazley, Collector of Taxes for the Township of Springfield, New Hanover Township Board of Education, Intervenor, County of Burlington, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Ind. School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API