Legal Opinion
Fort Dix Apartments Corp., a Corporation v. Borough of Wrightstown, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown, New Hanover Township Board of Education, Intervenor, County of Burlington, Intervenor. Sheridanville, Inc., a Corporation v. Borough of Wrightstown, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown, Township of Springfield, a Municipal Corporation, and R. J. Beazley, Collector of Taxes for the Township of Springfield, New Hanover Township Board of Education, Intervenor, County of Burlington, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 23, 1955No. 11513Published
1Opinion of the Court
225 F.2d 473
FORT DIX APARTMENTS CORP., a Corporation, Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF WRIGHTSTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown, New Hanover Township Board of Education, Intervenor,
County of Burlington, Intervenor.
SHERIDANVILLE, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF WRIGHTSTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, and I. Haines Croshaw, Collector of Taxes for the Borough of Wrightstown,
Township of Springfield, a Municipal Corporation, and R. J. Beazley, Collector of Taxes for the Township of Springfield,
New Hanover Township Board of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Meade Heights, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Siegfried v. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Fort Dix Apartments Corp. v. Borough of WrightstownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Sheridanville, Inc. v. Borough of WrightstownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954