In re Stow
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
On January 6, 1892, William M. Willey filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco an accusation in writing, verified by his own oath, alleg*588ing that the respondents Stow, Hammond, and Austin, “ while acting in the official capacity of commissioners of the Golden Gate Park,” entered into and signed an agreement with one Charles Warren, on or about August 12, 1891, whereby said' Warren contracted to perform certain work upon and within said public park; that the said contract was not drawn in the form prescribed by law, in that the stipulation, directed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Woods v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith v. LingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rankin v. JaumanIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Layne v. HayesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
- Sharps v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Edson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.