Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ling

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1885No. 11236PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

— The defendant, R. A. Ling, was a justice of the peace in and for Los Angeles township, county of Los Angeles, from January, 1883, to January 5, 1885.

*325This is a proceeding under section 772 of the Penal Code, which relates to the offense of “ charging and collecting illegal fees ” by officers, and for the refusal or neglect to “perform the official duties pertaining to his office.”

The information, which was filed after the defendant ceased to be an office-holder, is quite lengthy, and contains so many statements of fact by way of recital only, and so much that is indefinite and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Triplett v. MunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thurston v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Rankin v. JaumanIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Woods v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API