Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Sheehan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 27, 1978No. Civ. H-77-93PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This case presents the question whether a former city employee who was dismissed from a position funded under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 [“CETA” or “the Act”], 29 U.S.C. §§ 801-992, without prior written notice and an opportunity to respond to charges, is entitled to a back pay remedy upon reinstatement to another CETA position.
The plaintiff claims that his dismissal by the City of Meriden, Connecticut, from a CETA position without prior written notice violated a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Parks Conservation Association, Tropical Audubon Society v. Gail Norton, Fran P. ManellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Helen Armstrong v. Terry ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Harkness v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Gardner v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Richard Dorr v. County of Butte Butte County Sheriff's Department Mick Grey, Individually and as Deputy Sheriff of Butte CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.