Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. O'Connor
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 14, 1985No. 3290PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action for damages resulting from injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a one car accident, which occurred in East St. Amstead, Quebec, Canada. She alleges that she sustained various injuries as a result of the accident, all of which were caused by the defendant’s negligent operation of the motor vehicle. The defendant filed a motion to strike, claiming that Quebec law applied to the present action and under that law the plaintiff had no cause of action. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to strike and rendered judgment for the defendant after the plaintiff declined to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibson v. FullinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Murray v. City Of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Landers v. LandersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bohenek v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bissonnette v. BissonnetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ThurmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- D'Arcy v. ShugrueConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- State v. KnightonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.