Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 27, 2001No. CR 00-1062PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Charles Barnes was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for the 1997 killings of Eula and Dorothy Whidock. He raises nine points on appeal, none of which has merit.

For his first issue, Barnes challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending only that his conviction was unsupported by substantial evidence because it was based solely on the statement of an accomplice, Melanie Roberts, and his own inculpatory statements. In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the State and consider only…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Springs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API