Legal Opinion

Township of Hutchinson v. Filk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Edson, J., presiding, overruling his demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to enjoin the erection and maintenance of an obstruction to a public highway, and to recover damages for the expenses incurred by the town- in attempts to abate the nuisance. The appeal is from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The grounds urged by defendant in favor of his demurrer, and against the order appealed from, are, in substance, these: *537First. That a town, in its corporate capacity, has nothing to do with highways; that all powers and duties in respect to public roads are by statute vested in and imposed upon the supervisors, eo nomine, and not as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Pine City v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Peters v. Town of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Township of Blakely v. DevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Woodruff v. Town of GlendaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Woodruff v. Town of GlendaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Inhabitants of Houlton v. TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  3. State Ex Rel. Goff v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Olson v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API