Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Houlton v. Titcomb

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 18, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Equity. In equity. On report on agreed statement of facts. Decree in accordance with opinion. Bill in equity brought by the inhabitants of Houlton in the name of their selectmen against the defendants, Frank W. Titcomb and the Houlton Savings Bank to restrain them from the alleged, ánd intended, violation of certain municipal ordinances of the town of Houlton. regulating the erection, alteration and enlargement of wooden buildings within the limits of the “ Fire District”…

Read the full summary

In Equity. In equity. On report on agreed statement of facts. Decree in accordance with opinion. Bill in equity brought by the inhabitants of Houlton in the name of their selectmen against the defendants, Frank W. Titcomb and the Houlton Savings Bank to restrain them from the alleged, ánd intended, violation of certain municipal ordinances of the town of Houlton. regulating the erection, alteration and enlargement of wooden buildings within the limits of the “ Fire District” in said town. The bill, omitting formal parts, is as follows : “The inhabitants of the town of Houlton, in the county…

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This is a bill in equity brought by the inhabitants of Houlton in the name of their selectmen against Frank W. Titcomb and the Houlton Savings Bank, to restrain them from the alleged, and intended, violation of the town ordinances regulating the erection, alteration and enlargement of wooden buildings within the fire district of said town. The case comes to this court upon the bill, answer, replication and agreed statement of facts.

The bill properly sets out the ordinances alleged to have .been violated, their adoption at a legal town meeting, the ownership of property by the respondents and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Watertown v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Metropolitan Board of Health v. . HeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. City of Taunton v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. President of Waupun v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Village of Pine City v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Greenwich Gas Co. v. TuthillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. York Harbor Village Corp. v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Holzbauer v. RitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API