Provident Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Shaffer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Action to foreclose mortgage. Finding of the court that one note alleged to be secured thereby was never executed. Judgment and decree for amount of one note only, and for defendant upon the second note, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.
It appears from the record that defendant Susan E. Shaffer was a married woman, the wife of her codefendant, J. W. Shaffer, that she owned as her separate estate the premises described in the complaint; that on July 18, 1899, she and her husband executed to the plaintiff a mortgage on said premises to secure a note for $1,600 and any further advances by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moran v. GardemeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Morris v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Weithoff v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Berger v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Wood v. Parker Square State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Wong v. Beneficial Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ex Parte ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.