Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pikul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 5, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Murphy, P. J.

Diane Pikul was slain by her husband, Joseph Pikul, who was thereafter charged with having murdered her and, after a lengthy trial, found by a jury to be guilty of that offense. As it happened, however, Joseph Pikul died before he had been sentenced and his conviction was accordingly abated by operation of law.

Petitioners in the present proceeding are the temporary administrators of the estate of Diane Pikul. They seek a declaration to the effect that Joseph Pikul forfeited any right he may have had to succeed to the property of Diane Pikul by reason of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People v. MattesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. MintzNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Citibank, N. A. v. GoldbergNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re the Estate of MacaroNew York Surrogate's Court · 1999
  3. In re the Estates of CovertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Cardozo v. WlasiukNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Matter of BerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API