Hagan v. Hagan
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. The present action is not a case where the wife alleged jurisdiction of the court, and temporary alimony was awarded to enable the wife to contest the husband’s plea to the jurisdiction, within the rule stated in Carnes v. Carnes, 138 Ga. 1 (74 S. E. 785), Legg v. Legg, 150 Ga. 133 (102 S. E. 829), LaFitte v. LaFitte, 171 Ga. 404, (155 S. E. 521), and similar cases. In the present case the attachment for contempt did not issue until after a final judgment by this court affirming the judgment of the trial court in dismissing the wife’s cross-action for want of jurisdiction.
2.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carnes v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Franklin County v. CrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Schulze v. SchulzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Allen v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Lockhart v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Hagan v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952