Legal Opinion
United States v. Chandler
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided December 17, 1996No. CR90-H-266-E, CV95-H-8006-EPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CLAIMS. III D THROUGH III O OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE AND FOR A NEW TRIAL, INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ASSOCIATED WITH EVI-DENTIARY HEARINGS HELD OCTOBER 31, NOVEMBER 1, AND NOVEMBER 3,1995
HANCOCK, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant Chandler’s motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Rule 33, Fed.R.Crim.P., to vacate his conviction and sentence and for a new trial. This motion has been amended several times; the most recent version of the motion was filed on October 10, 1995, and this version was amended to add one new claim…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Bell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.