Legal Opinion

United States v. Sampson

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 26, 2004No. 01-10384-MLWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONCERNING POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

WOLF, District Judge.

This memorandum is based on the transcript of the decisions rendered orally on January 26, 2004, in which the court denied defendant Gary Sampson’s various post-trial motions and renewed challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. This memorandum adds some citations, clarifies some language, expands some discussion, and deletes some colloquies between the court and counsel.

* * * ❖

I. MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A HEARING BASED ON POST-VERDICT STATEMENTS BY JURORS

For the reasons described below,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary Lee SampsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Sampson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API