Legal Opinion

Mauro-Tartaglia v. Maxian

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 10, 2020No. 19-3083Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3083 Mauro-Tartaglia v. Maxian UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Hygh v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Dr. Judith Piesco v. Edward I. Koch, the City of New York, Department of Personnel, Juan Ortiz and Nicholas Laporte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. LiButti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Ali v. Nyc Police Officer Donald KippCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API